As I continue my way through Stephen E. Levick's book, "Clonebeing: Exploring the Psychological and Social Dimensions," another chapter is speaking strongly to me in its relationship to adoption. Levick addresses the dimension of "replacement" as a motivation in producing a clone. His Replacement Model centers largely on bereaved parents wishing to "replace," or fill the hole left by, a deceased child. The chapter is too extensive to be described here, but the parallel with adoption lies in the concept of the "false self" so frequently addressed in adoption literature. The implications for the plight of a clone are, to me, terrifying.
When a private investigator located my mother, I learned of the "replacement reaction" that occured in my own family. My first/natural/birth parents had married because my mother was pregnant, yet ultimately opted to relinquish anyway. They remained married and, two years later, had a son together, and shortly after, had a second son. I was taken aback by the fact that they had stayed together and proceeded to have a family together. It was a bitter irony that I'd been cut out of the loop. I now understand that it was the bereavement/replacement phenomenon.
Other than puzzling over the sense of irony, I've never had any conscious emotion on it all, but the implications are obvious... responses such as resentment, rage, feelings of rejection and inadequacy, feelings of being discarded. The Replacement Model in Levick's book has made me recognize that this aspect of my adoption is worth investing some inner work on.
I like your new look and the things you say make sense in a way I never thought about. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteI like the new look too. I am interested the book you are reading. Sounds like lots of food for thought.
ReplyDeleteAlice
Thanks for your comments on the "look". The program is so limited- a struggle to organize info in an appealing / orderly way!
ReplyDeleteJoy
As the author of "Clone Being," I occasionally do a search to try to gauge how people are responding to the book. Doing so brought me to your marvelous web site.
ReplyDeleteI'm delighted that you understand that the book is about so much more than the possibility of human reproductive cloning, and that you can relate personally to some of cloning's psychological and social analogues. That you are willing to share aspects of your own exploration with others is truly special.
Kind wishes,
Stephen E. Levick, M.D.
slevick@mail.med.upenn.edu